Crypto Casino Restricted Countries 2026: Who's Blocked
Crypto casino restricted countries are set per operator, not by law. Six sets of terms read on 15 September 2026: one blocks 7 countries, one blocks 228.
Affiliate disclosure: This page contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. 18+ only. Gamble responsibly — see BeGambleAware.org. Last updated 15 September 2026. Every country list, licence number and penalty clause below was read from the operator's own published terms on that date and is quoted rather than summarised.
Key takeaways
- The lists are nothing like each other. Crypto Loko names 7 countries. 7Bit Casino names 228. Both are offshore crypto casinos taking the same coins, and the gap is a business decision, not a legal one.
- Only four markets are blocked by all six operators we read — the UK, France, the Netherlands and Spain. The United States is on five of the six.
- Nine big markets appear on none of the lists, including Canada, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, Switzerland, Norway, Denmark, Finland and the UAE.
- Two casinos on the same licence publish different lists. mBit and 7Bit are both Scores55 Tech B.V. on licence OGL/2024/1307/0748, and they disagree about 17 countries including Poland, Sweden, Argentina and Brazil.
- There is a second map nobody mentions. Canada is restricted by none of the six at account level, and blocked from NextGen games at provider level — and 20 countries can play a NetEnt jackpot game, win it, and have the win annulled.
On this page
Ask which crypto casino restricted countries apply to you and every guide on page one answers a different question: is online gambling legal where you live. That is not the question. The casino holding your balance does not enforce your country's law — it enforces a list in section 2 or 3 of its own terms, and that list is shorter or longer depending on who its payment partners are, which regulator it answers to and which markets its lawyers decided are not worth the trouble.
The stakes are concrete. Deposit from a country on the list and the standard clause says the operator "cannot guarantee successful processing of withdrawals or refunds" — your money goes in fine and the argument starts on the way out. One of the six operators below reserves the right to close the account and confiscate the balance outright.
So on 15 September 2026 I sat down and read the published terms of six crypto casinos end to end, copied every restricted-country list out by hand, and compared them against each other rather than against a map of gambling law. The results are below with the licence number and the last-updated date of every document.
What came back was not a consensus with a few edge cases. It was six businesses that barely agree on anything except four countries.
What a restricted-country list actually is
It is a contract term, not a legal finding. The wording is near-identical across the market: "Users from the following countries and their territories ('Restricted Countries') are not allowed to deposit and play real money games", followed by a list, followed by a sentence limiting what happens if you do it anyway.
Three things follow from that, and all three are missing from the "is it legal in my country" articles that dominate this search.
1. The list is the operator's, so it changes per brand.
Two casinos in the same building on the same licence can publish different lists, and below, two of them do.
2. It is enforced at signup, deposit and withdrawal — but hardest at withdrawal.
Geo-blocking catches most attempts at the front door. The clause exists for the ones it misses, and it is written to be used when you ask for money back.
3. "Restricted" and "no bonus" are separate lists.
Sweden can play at Wild.io and at 7Bit. Sweden cannot have a bonus at either: Wild.io's clause 2.5 says "Any bonuses are not available to players from Sweden, including participation in any kind of promotional programs, or receiving VIP rewards."
Which means the only honest way to answer "can I play here" is to read the specific operator's specific list. Here are six of them.
Six operators, six very different lists
All six are crypto-first casinos licensed offshore, five of the six under Curaçao or Anjouan regimes that impose no common restricted-country list. Entry counts are of the list as published, counting a phrase like "France and its overseas territories" as one entry.
A 7-entry list and a 228-entry list are not two answers to the same question. Crypto Loko names Austria, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, the Union of Comoros and the United Kingdom, then adds "all FATF Blacklisted countries" — a blocklist aimed at regulated European markets and sanctions risk, and nothing else. It does not restrict the United States.
7Bit's list runs alphabetically from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe and is so long that it is faster to describe what is not on it. Both approaches are legal for an offshore operator. They are opposite bets about where the compliance risk sits.
Note also that the two longest lists belong to the same company. That is the finding I did not expect, and it gets its own section below.
Where you can and cannot play: 24 markets, six operators
This is the table the SERP does not have. Each cell is that operator's own published casino list on 15 September 2026 — "blocked" means the country is named in the restricted-countries clause, not that gambling is illegal there.
Four markets are blocked by all six: the UK, France, the Netherlands and Spain. Those are the four where a licensed domestic regime and an active regulator make offshore traffic more expensive than it is worth. Nothing else on the list gets unanimity — not even the United States, which Crypto Loko omits entirely.
The inverse is just as useful. Across 64 markets I checked, nine appear on none of the six lists: Canada, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, Switzerland, Norway, Denmark, Finland and the United Arab Emirates. Some of those are countries with strict domestic gambling law — the absence tells you what the operator will accept, not what your own jurisdiction permits.
And five of the six block Curaçao itself, including Cloudbet, which is licensed there by the Curaçao Gaming Authority. You cannot play from the island whose regulator issued the licence in the footer. That is normal in this industry and still worth seeing written down. If licence paperwork interests you, we walked the whole verification path in our crypto casino licence check.
Same licence, two different lists
mBit Casino and 7Bit Casino are both operated by Scores55 Tech B.V., company number 162990, at Scharlooweg 39, Willemstad, Curaçao, on licence OGL/2024/1307/0748. Same company, same address, same licence number, both stated in their own terms. Their restricted lists disagree about 17 countries.
Wording variants — "Côte d'Ivoire" against "Cote d Ivoire", "Bonaire" against "Bonaire St Eustatius and Saba" — were treated as matches, so the 17 above are substantive differences, not typos. A player in Buenos Aires is welcome at mBit and named in 7Bit's list. Same licence, same operator, opposite answers.
The same thing happens inside one brand. Wild.io keeps its casino list at clause 2.6 and its sportsbook list at clause 20.12, and the sportsbook list adds five countries the casino list does not carry: India, Kazakhstan, Nigeria, Serbia and Turkey. Nothing goes the other way. So at Wild.io an Indian player can spin a slot and cannot place a bet on cricket, from the same account and the same balance.
The lesson is small and annoying: "is this casino available in my country" has no answer at brand level. It has an answer per product, per licence, per document version.
The second map: your game provider has its own
Clear the operator's list and you meet a second one you never agreed to, imposed by the studios that make the games. mBit, 7Bit and BitStarz all reproduce NetEnt's restrictions in their own terms, and they are stricter in places than the casino's own policy. The jackpot clause is mBit's alone of the three.
Read the second row again, because it is the sharpest clause in any of these documents. A player in one of those 20 countries can open an account legitimately, load a NetEnt jackpot game, hit the jackpot — and the terms say the casino "will make reasonable efforts to prevent players from these countries to reach the games, but if players from any of the stated countries would win the jackpot, the jackpot win will be annulled".
Canada is the clean illustration of why the two maps matter separately. It is on none of the six account-level lists and it is named at provider level. "Not restricted" and "everything works" are different claims, and only the first one is on the tin.
What a breach actually costs you
This is where the advice sites go vague — "you might have issues withdrawing" — and where the terms are specific. The six split into three grades of consequence, quoted exactly.
Every single one of these is enforced at the moment you ask for your money, because that is the moment the casino has a reason to look. Deposits do not trigger a review. Withdrawals and KYC checks do — which is exactly why a no-KYC crypto casino feels frictionless right up until the cashout.
Notice too that BitStarz's general breach clause runs wider than geography: it reserves the right to "withhold payment of your winnings and apply such funds on account of any damages due by You" where it has "reasonable ground to suspect" a breach. Suspicion, not proof, is the stated threshold. That is standard drafting across this market, and it is the reason the geo question is worth two minutes before a deposit rather than an argument afterwards.
If you want the list in plain sight
BitStarz publishes its 65 countries in one paragraph
Of the six documents I read on 15 September 2026, BitStarz's was the easiest to actually use: clause 3.6 names all 65 restricted countries in one readable block, clause 3.7 states the consequence in one sentence, and clause 12.1 dates the terms to 25 June 2025. It also names its licensee, Gareton B.V., company number 160656 on licence OGL/2024/165/0185, so the paperwork can be checked independently.
Visit BitStarz →Affiliate link. 18+ only. Readable terms are not a recommendation — read clause 3.6 for your own country, and see our full BitStarz review before depositing.
Check your own country in two minutes
Do not trust a table on an affiliate site — including this one — for a decision involving your own money. The lists change, and mine is a snapshot of one day. Here is the check that takes two minutes and survives the next revision.
1. Open the terms, not the FAQ.
The restricted list lives in the terms and conditions, usually section 2 or 3, under a heading like "Restricted Countries Policy". Support articles summarise; the terms bind.
2. Search the page for your country, then for your region.
Use your browser's find. Check the country name, then any territory phrasing that captures you — "and its territories", "overseas territories", "Dutch West Indies". BitStarz names the UK "including any overseas territories"; Cloudbet names three Ukrainian regions and not the country.
3. Check the sportsbook clause separately if you bet on sport.
Wild.io's is 14 clauses further down and five countries longer. If a site runs both products, assume two lists until you have seen otherwise.
4. Search the same page for "bonus" and your country.
Bonus eligibility is a separate list. Sweden is the standing example: allowed to play at two of these casinos, allowed no promotion at either.
5. Note the document date.
7Bit's terms carry a version number and a date (v2.7, 25 February 2026); mBit's say 9 March 2026; Cloudbet's and Wild.io's carry no date at all. An undated list is one you have to re-read before each deposit.
If your country is on the list, the honest answer is to pick a different casino rather than a different IP address. The clause that voids your winnings does not care why you were there.
Frequently asked questions
Which countries are restricted at every crypto casino?
Across the six sets of terms I read on 15 September 2026, only four countries appear on every list: the United Kingdom, France, the Netherlands and Spain. The United States is on five of the six — Crypto Loko's seven-country list does not name it. There is no industry-wide restricted list, so "every crypto casino blocks X" is almost always wrong.
Can I use a VPN to play at a restricted crypto casino?
The terms are explicit that you cannot. mBit's capitalised clause reserves the right to close the account and cancel any winnings if a VPN is used to mask location; BitStarz and 7Bit say using a VPN to bypass a provider's block "may lead to confiscation of winnings"; Crypto Loko prohibits VPNs and proxies outright. A VPN may get you through the front door, and it is the withdrawal that gets reviewed.
What happens to my money if I deposit from a restricted country?
It depends on the operator, and the range is wide. Cloudbet reserves the right to close the account and confiscate the remaining balance. mBit reserves the right to cancel winnings where a VPN was used. BitStarz, 7Bit and Wild.io all use the softer formula that they "cannot guarantee successful processing of withdrawals or refunds", with 7Bit adding that it will "apply reasonable measures to remit the funds". None of them promises to return your deposit.
Is Canada restricted at crypto casinos?
Not at account level by any of the six operators here — Canada appears on none of their restricted lists. It is restricted at game level: mBit's clause 2.8 says "Players from Canada are not allowed to play NYX (NextGen) games", and BitStarz (4.5) and 7Bit carry the same rule as "Players from Canada are not eligible to play the games from NYX". So a Canadian account works and part of the game library does not, which is a distinction no availability guide makes.
Why do two casinos with the same licence have different restricted lists?
Because the list is commercial, not regulatory. mBit and 7Bit are both Scores55 Tech B.V. on licence OGL/2024/1307/0748 and their lists differ on 17 countries, including Poland, Sweden, Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Peru and Brazil. Neither Curaçao nor Anjouan imposes a common blocklist, so each brand sets its own according to its payment partners, game suppliers and appetite for regulatory attention in a given market.
Can a casino annul a jackpot I have already won?
For NetEnt jackpot games, the terms say yes. mBit's clause lists 20 countries — including Australia, India, Japan, Israel, Italy, Portugal, Qatar, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine and the UAE — whose players are "not eligible to win any jackpots", and states that if such a player does win, "the jackpot win will be annulled". The casino undertakes only to make "reasonable efforts" to keep those players out of the games in the first place.
Does a no-KYC casino still enforce country restrictions?
Yes. No-KYC describes what you hand over at signup, not what the operator checks later. Geo-blocking runs on IP at the front door regardless of documents, and the restricted-countries clause is written to be applied at withdrawal, which is precisely when a no-KYC site starts asking questions. Skipping ID checks removes the paperwork, not the clause.
What I would actually do
Treat the restricted list as a property of the document, not of the brand or of your country's law. Three practical consequences.
First, check before you deposit, because every penalty in these terms is written to bite on the way out. Two minutes with a browser find-in-page is cheaper than a support ticket about a confiscated balance, and the withdrawal leg is already expensive enough without adding a contested one.
Second, if you are in one of the four unanimous markets — the UK, France, the Netherlands, Spain — no offshore operator on this list wants your account, and the ones that would take it anyway are the ones with the least to lose from an argument. That is a reason to use a licensed domestic site, not a reason to shop harder offshore.
Third, if your country is absent from every list, you have cleared one hurdle out of three. The provider layer still applies, the bonus list is separate, and the sportsbook may carry its own map. Clearing the account-level check is the beginning of the question.
One honest caveat, the same one as always: this is six documents on one day, four of them undated by their own publishers. Lists get revised without announcement, and a country that is absent this morning can be named this evening. If you are about to move real money, open the terms and read the clause yourself — including if the table above says you are fine. Our deposit-fee data has the same shelf life, and so does everyone else's.
Related guides
Crypto casino licence check
Ten casinos checked against the Curaçao register, and five surprises.
Crypto casino withdrawal fees
78 published rates, and why the minimum is the real fee.
Crypto casino self-exclusion
What six operators' own rules actually let you switch off.
Best no-KYC crypto casinos
Where geo-blocking is the only check left standing.
BitStarz review
Gareton B.V., 65 restricted countries, terms you can actually read.
Wild.io review
Anjouan licence, and two restricted lists in one set of terms.
18+ only. Gambling can be addictive — see BeGambleAware.org, or install BetBlocker, which is free. Sources read on 15 September 2026: Cloudbet's terms (clause 7.1.3); BitStarz's terms (clauses 3.6-3.7, 4.3); 7Bit Casino's terms (section 3, v2.7); mBit Casino's terms (clauses 2.3-2.9); Wild.io's terms (clauses 2.5-2.6 and 20.12); and Crypto Loko's terms (clause 4.1.3). Restricted lists change without notice — read the clause yourself before you deposit. Affiliate links earn us a commission at no cost to you.